Skip to content
Artifisys
Menu
Start a conversation Talk to us

Healthcare

Your documentation is not the problem. The 6am scramble to backfill a call-out is.

Caregiver turnover is at 79%. The software you bought was designed around the chart, not the caregiver.

Book a 20-minute call Free. No demo, no slides.
75%

caregiver turnover across the home care industry, the lowest reading since 2021.

Source: Activated Insights Benchmarking Report (formerly Home Care Pulse)

What is happening

The notes are fine. The 6am scramble is the problem.

HOPE Hospices are still missing HUV windows

Seven months into HOPE implementation, the most common compliance failure is a missed Hospice Update Visit window. Some EMRs shipped templates late, so clinicians double-document.

The real operational pain has moved

Missed visits, late clock-ins, expired certifications, GPS drift on EVV, and a coordinator working the phones at dawn. None of it is a documentation problem.

EVV data that passed in 2025 gets denied in 2026

Claims accepted with marginal electronic visit verification data are now being rejected. The tolerance has gone.

Scheduling and clinical systems do not talk

The coordinator knows who called out. The clinical system knows who was due a visit. Nothing connects them until something is already missed.

Intelligence, plumbed in

A carer's visit note holds the risk. No field does.

We build the reader and the connector, then measure it against notes a clinician has already assessed.

How we make AI survive real data
  • Connectors
  • A semantic layer
  • Evals you can check

What changes

Judge us on this, not on what we built.

Visits kept

Gaps surfaced before they become missed visits

Schedule, availability, certification status and visit windows in one place, with the call-out risk visible the evening before, not the morning after.

Clean claims

EVV exceptions caught at the point of care

GPS drift, late clock-ins and mismatches flagged while the caregiver is still on site and it can still be fixed.

Compliance

HUV and assessment windows tracked, not remembered

With enough warning to act, and an audit trail that shows you did.

Research

We wrote a full page on each of these, with the sources.

Each one carries its own figures and the citations behind them. Start with whichever sounds most like your week.

However hard, whatever it is

The 6am scramble is one example. Bring the real one.

This page is about filling a gap before the shift. If yours is recruitment, mileage or an assessment window nobody tracks, we work the same way.

  1. 01

    We sit with you

    Days where the work happens, not a workshop in a meeting room. We watch the job get done and write down the shortcuts nobody wrote down.

  2. 02

    We read everything

    Your data, your rules, your vendors and their documentation, and the published research on your sector. We report what is actually in there.

  3. 03

    We break it to first principles

    Not which tool fixes this. What is actually causing it, taken apart until we reach the piece that cannot be divided further.

  4. 04

    Then we build

    Weeks, not quarters. By this point we are not guessing what to build, and guessing is the thing that makes projects long.

Where we sit

Your scheduling system stays. We build the morning that runs itself.

4

What you get

  • Visits kept Gaps surfaced before they become missed visits
  • Clean claims EVV exceptions caught at the point of care
  • Compliance HUV and assessment windows tracked, not remembered
3

Built new for you — none of this exists in your stack today

  • A carer app that works where there are no bars
  • A call-out that fills a gap before 6am
  • A small tracker for cars the system cannot see
2
The scheduling layer Reads your rota and visits. Changes nothing without a scheduler saying yes. Connectors, one agreed meaning per field, and a model reading what no field holds. Accuracy measured on your own records.
1
  • Homecare Homebase
  • WellSky
  • Axxess
  • Netsmart
  • iQIES

What you already run — unchanged, and still yours

If a carer wrote it, we can capture it. A phone with no signal, a paper visit note, a fax from a surgery. All of it can reach one place.

  • No API
  • No documentation
  • A terminal from 1994
  • It arrives as paper
  • The vendor said no
  • It reports nothing

Not a list of limits. Name yours on the call.

And once we can reach it, a model can read it. Most of the value here is in the sources nobody ever structured — the note, the letter, the screen.

Who this is for

The people who feel this first

  • Administrator
  • Director of Clinical Services
  • Scheduling Manager
  • Compliance Officer
  • Owner

Straight answers

The questions you would ask on the call

  • Do you replace our EMR?

    No. We build the operational layer that sits beside it — scheduling risk, EVV exceptions, compliance windows — and integrate with what you already run.

  • Can you help with HOPE compliance?

    Yes, specifically around timeliness. The most common failure is a missed HUV window, and that is a tracking and alerting problem, not a clinical one.

  • How quickly can this be in place?

    We read your data first, over a few weeks, so we are both working from your real visit and claim records rather than guesses. A build after that usually takes a few months.

  • Can AI read a carer's visit note reliably?

    We measure it against notes a clinician has already assessed, and report accuracy before anyone acts on it. The clinician stays in charge.

Next step

Start with your own numbers.

  1. We talk

    20 minutes. Free.

    You tell us what is not working. We ask how the work really gets done.

  2. We look at your data

    A few weeks.

    We read your systems, including the notes and letters no field holds. You get what is really in there, what it costs, and the accuracy we can hit.

  3. We build

    A few months.

    Only if step 2 says it is worth it. Fixed price, agreed before we start.