$104K A ten-person firm loses that a year from two unlogged hours a week each
At a $100 rate. At consulting rates the same leak is several times larger.
Professional services · UK & Europe
Billable utilisation just hit its lowest point in nineteen years.
Sixty-six point four percent. And the firms losing least are the ones that stopped relying on memory.
$816.4B
quarterly US revenue for professional, scientific and technical services, up 6.4% on a year earlier.
In the UK and Europe
This is what it actually runs on here.
Platforms in this market
- Xero
- Sage
- QuickBooks
- NetSuite
- Access Financials
Rules that apply here
- Making Tax Digital
- UK GAAP and FRS 102
- UK GDPR
- EU e-invoicing mandates
We read the rule before the call. It is the cheapest way to prove we did the work.
What is happening
Billable hours are at a nineteen-year low, and the timesheets came in late again.
90-95% Of delivered hours actually reach an invoice
The rest is delivered, absorbed and forgotten. It does not appear as a loss anywhere, which is why it persists.
Leakage is a handoff problem
A late timesheet becomes an unbilled hour, which becomes a delayed invoice. Each handoff loses a little, and no single team owns the chain.
The talent pipeline is shrinking
US accounting graduates fell 6.6% against roughly 124,200 annual openings. Manual work is now competing for people who have options.
However hard, whatever it is
Billable hours are one example. Bring the question you cannot answer.
We wrote this about which work actually pays. If yours is resourcing, pipeline or a month-end that takes two weeks, the method holds.
-
01 We sit with you
Days where the work happens, not a workshop in a meeting room. We watch the job get done and write down the shortcuts nobody wrote down.
-
02 We read everything
Your data, your rules, your vendors and their documentation, and the published research on your sector. We report what is actually in there.
-
03 We break it to first principles
Not which tool fixes this. What is actually causing it, taken apart until we reach the piece that cannot be divided further.
-
04 Then we build
Weeks, not quarters. By this point we are not guessing what to build, and guessing is the thing that makes projects long.
Where we sit
Your accounts package stays. We build the view of which work actually pays.
4
What you get
- Captured Time recorded from work that already happened
- Realisation The delivered-to-billed gap measured and closed
- Retention Less of the week spent re-keying
3
Built new for you — none of this exists in your stack today
- A timesheet already filled in when they open it
- A job board that shows margin, not just hours
- A monthly pack that goes out without three people chasing it
2
The engagement layer Reads your ledger and time. Invoices nobody until you press send.
Connectors, one agreed meaning per field, and a model reading what no
field holds. Accuracy measured on your own records.
1
- Xero
- Sage
- QuickBooks
- NetSuite
- Access Financials
What you already run — unchanged, and still yours
If it is in the ledger, we can reach it. A desktop accounts package, a timesheet in a spreadsheet, an invoice as a PDF. All of it can be joined.
-
No API -
No documentation -
A terminal from 1994 -
It arrives as paper -
The vendor said no -
It reports nothing
Not a list of limits. Name yours on the call.
And once we can reach it, a model can read it. Most of the value here is in the sources nobody ever structured — the note, the letter, the screen.
Intelligence, plumbed in
A week of work can be described from what already happened.
A connector to your ledger and calendars, one definition of billable in the layer, and nothing invoiced until you send it.
How we make AI survive real data-
Connectors -
A semantic layer -
Evals you can check
What changes
Judge us on this, not on what we built.
Captured Time recorded from work that already happened
Rather than reconstructed on Friday, when accuracy has already decayed by a quarter to a third.
Realisation The delivered-to-billed gap measured and closed
Visible per engagement, per person and per client, while there is still something to do about it.
Retention Less of the week spent re-keying
Which is a retention argument as much as a margin one, in a market where replacing people is expensive and slow.
Who this is for
The people who feel this first
-
Managing Partner -
Chief Operating Officer -
Finance Director -
Practice Leader -
Head of Delivery
Straight answers
The questions you would ask on the call
-
Is this just another timesheet tool?
No. A timesheet tool asks people to record time; the problem is that they do not, and no amount of reminding fixes it. Capture has to be derived from work that already leaves a trace, with the person confirming rather than composing.
-
How quickly does this pay back?
Calculate it from your own figures. Multiply your fee earners by two hours a week by your blended rate. That is the conservative case, and most firms leak more than two.
-
Do you work with firms outside the US?
Yes. We work with US, European and Indian firms. The leakage problem is identical in all three — only the systems and the rates differ.
-
Can AI fill timesheets from what actually happened?
It drafts them from your calendars and ledger. Nothing is billed until a person presses send. We measure the drafts against real weeks.
Do you know the rules that apply in the United Kingdom, Ireland and the European Union?
For accounting & consulting that means Making Tax Digital, UK GAAP and FRS 102, UK GDPR and EU e-invoicing mandates. We read the rule before the call, so the first meeting is about your operation rather than about us catching up.
Whatever accounting & consulting needs here, we can make it.
What you already run stays where it is. Around it we build software, hardware and the process itself. Here that means a timesheet already filled in when they open it.
See everything we build-
Software -
Hardware -
Ways of working -
Whole ventures
Honest about the numbers
The figure above is from US Census Bureau: Quarterly Services Survey, for accounting & consulting.
We have not localised it, because a number nobody can check is worth less than a real one plus this sentence. The pattern travels. The size of it in your market is a question for the call.
Same industry, other markets