Skip to content
Artifisys
Menu
Start a conversation Talk to us

Manufacturing

Every line you built is one of a kind, and its history is in service notes

How do we see what we actually built and changed on each machine we sold, across every country we serve?

Book a 20-minute call Free. No demo, no slides.

Figures and rules on this page apply to

European Union

Working somewhere else? The shape of the problem usually travels. The deadlines do not.

What this looks like

A customer calls about a line installed eight years ago. The drawings show what was sold. Three retrofits and a dozen part swaps happened since. The engineer who did them has left. Someone spends a morning in old reports before quoting a spare part.

The numbers

Every figure here is someone else’s. Check them.

  • 62.2M tfresh vegetables harvested in the EU in 2024, up 6% on 2023
  • 24.3M tfruit harvested in the EU in 2024
  • 3.0Mfull-time farm workers' worth of labour lost across the EU between 2010 and 2025
  • 29.1%fall in EU farm labour input from 2010 to 2025

Why it happens

It is not a people problem.

Each line is designed for one site and one crop, so no two are the same. After handover, every change is logged in a service report written by whoever did the work. The ERP knows what was invoiced. It does not know what is bolted to the frame today.

Why your current software has not fixed it

Because it was never built to.

Service software records visits and hours. It stores the engineer's write-up as text and never reads it. Product data tools describe the design as sold, not as changed. So the true state of each machine exists only in reports nobody has time to reread.

Intelligence, plumbed in

A service engineer's note saying 'swapped the outfeed motor, see photo' is a record. It can be read and filed against the right machine.

We build the layer that reads every report and file for each line, then answers service and sales questions from it. Underneath it: a connector, one agreed meaning per field, and a test set scored on your own records.

How we make AI survive real data
  • Connectors
  • A semantic layer
  • Evals you can check

However hard, whatever it is

Packing lines are one example. Bring the equipment you build to order.

We wrote this about produce equipment because farm labour data makes the demand clear. The same gap exists for any maker that services what it sold.

  1. 01

    We sit with you

    Days where the work happens, not a workshop in a meeting room. We watch the job get done and write down the shortcuts nobody wrote down.

  2. 02

    We read everything

    Your data, your rules, your vendors and their documentation, and the published research on your sector. We report what is actually in there.

  3. 03

    We break it to first principles

    Not which tool fixes this. What is actually causing it, taken apart until we reach the piece that cannot be divided further.

  4. 04

    Then we build

    Weeks, not quarters. By this point we are not guessing what to build, and guessing is the thing that makes projects long.

What we build

Specific enough to argue with.

Four mechanisms, not four features. Each one is a thing that happens on its own, every day, whether or not anyone remembers to run it.

  • Service reports, commissioning files and change notes read and joined into one history per installed line.

  • Spare-part quotes checked against what is on the machine now, not what the original drawing shows.

  • Repeated faults across lines of the same build grouped, so design teams see them before customers complain.

  • Retrofit and upgrade leads drawn from the installed base, ranked by age and change history.

How you would know it worked

Numbers in your own reporting, not ours.

  • Hours from a customer call to a correct spare-part quote.
  • Share of service visits where the engineer arrives with the right part the first time.
  • Retrofit revenue from lines already in the field.

Straight answers

Where a model is involved, it is scored against your own records first. Accuracy per source, not one flattering average.

The questions this raises

  • We already have a service management system.

    Keep it. It schedules visits well. This reads what engineers write in it, which the system stores but does not use.

  • Our older lines were documented on paper.

    Scanned reports and drawings can be read too. Older lines usually gain the most, because nobody remembers them.

  • How soon would service see a difference?

    Usually within weeks for the lines with the most calls. The history fills in as more reports are read.

Somebody noticed first, and nothing consumed it

The earliest warning is a note in a box nothing reads.

A driver, a fitter, an engineer or an adviser saw it coming and wrote it down. It went into free text. Free text does not trigger anything, does not add up, and never tells you that four people reported the same thing this week.

Different work, same box nobody reads. Whatever your people notice first, it is being written down somewhere already.Tell us what yours write down.

Your installed base is your best sales list, and it is written in service notes.

We build the layer that reads every report and file for each line, then answers service and sales questions from it.

See everything we build
  • Software
  • Hardware
  • Ways of working
  • Whole ventures

Is this happening to you? Tell us the size of it.

Twenty minutes. We will tell you honestly whether the numbers justify doing anything about it.